Despite the fact that the addition of development charges
should not deter people from purchasing a new home in the
Greater Sudbury Area, the whole issue of development charges may need to be
given a second look. Apparently, one of the things that is
holding up the construction of the new mall across from
Carol Richard Park is the development charges that the City
is imposing on the developer. Developers have always been
required to for all of the infrastructure on their property,
so once the water and sewer is hooked up from th...e
City lines, everything else is paid for by the developer.
However, upon careful
examination, it appears as if the
development charges are a form of "franchise fee" or "tax
levy" being imposed upon a developer in order to build in
our City. It is kind of like a surcharge to pay for things
like increased police and fire protection, and a number of
other costs that are associated with municipal services. However,
those extra expenses will be paid for through property taxes
that are charged to the new homeowners or tenants on an
on-going basis. Therefore
there needs to be a good examination of what these
development charges are actually funding.
If this is simply a way
that the City is applying an extra tax to new developments,
then it may be time to stop this practice to encourage
development and avoid prejudicial treatment of new
residents. The Mall developer in Val Caron should not be
forced to pay an extra $250,000 to put in a collector pond
that is not on his property in addition to very high
development charges for his buildings on top of the $1
million he has to pay for traffic lights, curbs along the
front of his property, and other upgrades. This is causing
much of the delay in construction and does need to be looked
at again if that is the case. Transferring the cost of
development charges is forcing developers to increase the
selling price and lease charges to a level that is not
viable for a lot of tenants.
What I think is happening is that in order to deal with the
drainage issues in the area where the new mall is to be
developed, the City is going to be constructing some sort of
underground pond to hold excess water (that may be
simplifying the matter). But this is not just related to the
property where the mall is going to be built, but also to
take care of issues with respect to a housing development
that may end up being done behind the Mall and along that
whole area. It is not just to benefit the Mall.
I understand that this retaining pond is something that may
have been needed for a while but with the new development
proposal the City decided to add it to the list of
requirements. The same holds true for the traffic lights
since the road coming from the mall will also connect to a
housing development that is going up behind the Jehovah's
Witness property. In any event, some of these extra costs
are one thing, but the other is that the per unit or per
house development charges are over and above what a person
would normally need to pay to build the development and
infrastructure.
It appears to be an extra levy on new
developments in order to generate money to pay for general
funding purposes that may or may not have anything to do
with the area around the property. Some of the development
charges for the mall may be used to pay for some
improvements in another part of the City. If that is the
case then it is an unfair tax being imposed on one
particular segment of our population to benefit the rest and
it may be delaying construction somewhat. For example,
before the mall developer across from Carol Richard Park can
even begin to construct stores in order to generate rental
income, he needs to have about $2 million on hand to deal
with the requirements imposed by the City on top of his
infrastructure and construction costs. That is a lot of
money to have to put up before building. This does need to
be looked at more closely.
WHOLE ISSUE OF DEVELOPMENT CHARGES WILL NEED TO
BE RE-EXAMINED
If you look at the 2013 Report to City Council, and scroll
down to the charts that give you an accounting of where the
development charges were spent, you will see that the
development charges collected from the Valley for example,
go into a reserve fund and are drawn out to pay for all
kinds of "growth related" projects from the Walden Ski Hill
to the widening of the Ski Hill to the expansion of
ambulance garages.
http://www.greatersudbury.ca/.../2013TreasurerReport(1).pdf
So the development charges have become a way of imposing a
"levy" upon developers in order to grant them a permit to
build new houses, apartments and commercial structures. It
is almost like extortion. If you don't pay the development
charges you can't build. The funds are then used to pay for
projects that the City has entered into and in many cases
projects that are dependant on future development charges to
cover their costs.
They have absolutely nothing to do with the costs associated
with the new development. They are instead covering
additional costs of other projects already underway to allow
the growth of the city that has already taken place. Those
costs are shared by all of the ratepayers, but the people
buying a new house must not only pay their share of the
taxes, they also pay a "development charge" on top of their
purchase since most developers pass that cost on to the
buyer.
This is why a lot of development has slowed down in Sudbury
and in particular the Valley. The big problem is that if the
development grinds to a stop, then the City will not raise
the anticipated total of development funds during the year
and the projected funding for many projects will not be
there. It also means that property taxes will not be
collected from the undeveloped property. It then will have
to come from other reserves. It has gone on for so long that
it is almost impossible to put a stop to it without facing
some significant financial repercussions. But it is slowing
down the development in our area.
The following link will take you to a 178 page
presentation
that was made to City Council on April 17, 2014 with an
explanation of the Development Charges that are being
proposed and how the funds are being allocated. If you try
to read it you will see why I am a supporter of full-time
Councillors.
http://www.greatersudbury.ca/.../2014%20Development...
On Page 149, you will see that the projected cost, according
to the City, of the Maley Drive Extension project is over
$125 million. They expect to receive $83 million in grants
and subsidies, although the province and federal governments
are only expected to come up with $53 million. The Net
Municipal share of this cost is set at $41 million. But
between 2009 and 2023, they expect to direct $9 million of
this from general taxes and $33 million from development
charges.
So in reality, we don't even have the money set
aside yet. We are planning on diverting $32 million of the
development charges collected between now and 2023 towards
the cost of this project, but even with that, we have set
aside some $18 million of this against development charges
collected after 2023.
If you look at page 156, you will see that our total
projected costs for roads and related projects is estimated
at $385 million. Out of that the municipality is expecting
to receive $200 million in grants and subsidies and will
have to come up with $185 million on our own. Out of the
$185 million, the city staff have calculated that a total of
$117,000 is eligible to be generated through development
charges, with $51 million being raised from now until 2023,
$20 million being taken out of previously raised development
charges collected from other development in the city, and
$46 million being raised after 2023.
If you remove the Maley
Drive project,
look at what it does to the calculations.
Our total projected cost for roads
and related projects drops to $260 million.
Our municipality will be expected
to receive a total of $117 million in grants and subsidies.
Our municipal share of these projects will be $143 million.
Development charges will only raise a total of
$85 million
And
we will only be required to raise a total of $38 million
from now until 2023 and $28 million after 2023.
This would have a significant impact on the development
charges that must be applied to new growth projects over the
next ten years and might stimulate growth.
SYSTEMIC PROBLEM THAT
WILL BE DIFFICULT TO CORRECT
The problem is that if we base our decisions on new projects
from what is contained in this report, we could be getting
ourselves into some projects while counting on future
development charges that may or may not be obtained if our
developers decide to hold off on development.
We have also commited a tremendous amount of future
development charges to projects that will be post 2023.
I think anyone running for Council should read this report
very carefully in order to be prepared for the kind of
statistical nightmare that will be presented to them should
they be elected. I know it has enlightened me a lot. I
wonder how many of our current councillors have read this
report from cover to cover?
RETURN TO ROBERT KIRWAN'S HOME PAGE